currently reading

Paul Ryan Selection Affirms Mitt Romney’s Flip-Flop On Abortion

via Bob Egelko, Politics Blog, The San Francisco Chronicle

Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan as his running mate cements Romney’s own 180-degree turnabout on abortion.

Ten years ago, as a candidate for governor, Romney promised to “protect the right of a woman to choose,” and pledged not to change “our pro-choice laws in Massachusetts.” Three years later, after vetoing a bill that would have made it easier to get morning-after contraceptive pills, he described himself as anti-abortion and claimed his position had never changed.

Today, Romney wants the Supreme Court to repeal Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 ruling that prevents states from banning abortion, and says he would also “get rid of” Planned Parenthood, an organization he once supported.

Ryan,  on the other hand, has been unswerving. The Wisconsin congressman gets a 100 percent rating from the National Right to Life Committee and zero from Planned Parenthood.

“I’m as pro-life as a person gets. You’re not going to have a truce,” he told the conservative Weekly Standard in 2010. In an essay that year, he wrote that “the right of ‘choice’ of one human being cannot trump the right to ‘life’ of another.”

Ryan has voted to ban federal funding for any health plan that covers abortion and to eliminate federal funding for Planned Parenthood. He has co-sponsored federal ”personhood” legislation that would declare a fertilized embryo to be a human being, which would outlaw abortion nationwide — overriding abortion-rights laws in California and other states — and might also affect certain types of birth control.

That goes further than Romney, who says he wants to leave the abortion issue up to the states. Romney also would allow women to terminate pregnancies caused by rape or incest, exceptions that Ryan opposes.

As for contraception, Ryan said in a recent interview that President Obama’s decision to require employers to cover birth control as part of their health insurance plans showed a “paternalistic, arrogant political philosophy” that violated “our First Amendment rights to religious freedom.”

Continue Reading


No comments yet.

Have Something To Say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Favorite Topics:

The Archives:

%d bloggers like this: